Craig Moore’s Strange Verdict on Celtic’s Dominant Victory Over Rangers

Craig Moore’s Strange Verdict on Celtic’s Dominant Victory Over Rangers

In the aftermath of Celtic’s comprehensive 4-0 victory over Rangers at Ibrox, former Rangers captain Craig Moore’s analysis of the match raised more than a few eyebrows. While the scoreline clearly indicated a dominant performance by the Hoops, Moore’s assessment seemed to paint a different picture—one that has since sparked widespread debate among fans and pundits alike.

In his post-match comments, Moore suggested that Celtic’s approach was more conservative than the scoreline suggested. He pointed to what he perceived as a more pragmatic style of play, focusing on how Celtic’s backline was positioned deeper than usual, particularly in the first half. According to Moore, this tactic indicated a level of caution that some might not have expected from a team that was so clearly in control.

“Celtic didn’t really take the game to Rangers in the way you’d expect from a team winning 4-0,” Moore said. “They were very organized at the back, but it wasn’t the sort of dominant, attacking display you’d associate with a scoreline like that.”

Many Celtic supporters and neutral observers were quick to counter Moore’s assessment, arguing that it downplayed the quality and clinical nature of Celtic’s performance. The Hoops were ruthless in taking their chances, with Kyogo Furuhashi, Matt O’Riley, and others showcasing their attacking prowess. Despite Moore’s claims of a conservative approach, Celtic’s front line was relentless, capitalizing on nearly every opportunity and leaving Rangers with no chance to respond.

In fact, most analysts credited Celtic with a masterclass in game management, combining solid defensive organization with lethal counter-attacking play. This, they argued, was the true hallmark of their performance—not a defensive posture, but a balanced, well-executed strategy that maximized their strengths and exposed Rangers’ weaknesses.

Moore’s comments reflect a broader tendency among some former Rangers players and supporters to view Celtic’s victories through a lens of skepticism, often attributing their success to factors other than pure footballing superiority. While it’s fair to say that every pundit has their own perspective, Moore’s interpretation of this particular match seems especially controversial given the clear dominance Celtic displayed on the day.

It’s possible that Moore’s perspective is shaped by his long-standing ties to Rangers, making it difficult to give full credit to Celtic. However, it’s also worth considering that his analysis may be rooted in a belief that the Hoops were not at their most attacking best, despite the outcome.

In the end, Craig Moore’s verdict on Celtic’s performance has divided opinion. For many, the scoreline speaks for itself—a dominant Celtic team dismantling their rivals in their own backyard. For others, Moore’s cautious take offers a different perspective, one that suggests the Hoops may not have been as offensively overwhelming as the final score indicates.

Regardless of where one stands on Moore’s analysis, there’s no denying that Celtic’s victory was a significant statement in the context of the Scottish Premiership. Whether they did so with an eye on defense or by unleashing a full-throttle attack, the result was the same: a resounding win that further cements their status as the team to beat this season.

As the dust settles, one thing remains clear—Craig Moore’s strange verdict has added yet another layer to the ever-fascinating narrative of the Old Firm rivalry.

Read more on;https://basicsportnews.com